<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Competition Demolition &#187; algorithms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://Competitiondemolition.com/tag/algorithms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://Competitiondemolition.com</link>
	<description>Online Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 19:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Google SEO &amp; Myths</title>
		<link>http://Competitiondemolition.com/understanding-google-seo-myths/</link>
		<comments>http://Competitiondemolition.com/understanding-google-seo-myths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkbuilding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Competitiondemolition.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an inside advantage to Google that most people I know simply don&#8217;t. No, it&#8217;s not a girlfriend that works there. No, I haven&#8217;t got Matt Cutt&#8217;s cell phone number. No, I haven&#8217;t hacked into their systems either&#8230; No, what I&#8217;m talking about is experience. For the last 7 years, I&#8217;ve watched the search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>I have an inside advantage to Google that most people I know simply don&#8217;t.</h1>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not a girlfriend that works there.<br />
No, I haven&#8217;t got Matt Cutt&#8217;s cell phone number.<br />
No, I haven&#8217;t hacked into their systems either&#8230;</p>
<p>No, what I&#8217;m talking about is experience. For the last 7 years, I&#8217;ve watched<br />
the search giant value pages in different ways. For those who still don&#8217;t understand<br />
search engines, you&#8217;re doing yourself a major dis-service. Mind you, there<br />
isn&#8217;t anyone out there explaining it very simply either. It&#8217;s all pretty technical.</p>
<p><strong>SEO History for Non-Technical Folks&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>(1995) In the begining, there was words. Websites had words, people searched<br />
for words&#8230; But search engines didn&#8217;t exist. Directories like Yahoo did.<br />
You searched for Plumbing, and guess what? AAAA1 Plumbing was #1.</p>
<p>(1996) Then Came Search engines, The more times you mentioned the words<br />
(Keyword Density) The more &quot;on topic&quot; your site was.</p>
<p>That seemed to work quite well until folks started making websites that said<br />
the word &quot;cheese&quot; 5,000 times at the bottom of each page. Yay, we&#8217;re #1<br />
for cheese in Yahoo! How Cheesy is that?</p>
<h2><strong>(1998) Google Arrives&#8230;</strong></h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://Competitiondemolition.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/google-1998.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong> Directories (Are ya in the internet phone book at least?)<br />
</strong> Links pointing to the site (Do other people like your site enough to talk about it?)<br />
* Age &#8211; Ah yes, and some experience would be good!</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s original theory was that if all these documents were on a &quot;main server&quot;<br />
in an office, how would you locate the document the searcher was looking for?<br />
We&#8217;d assume it would be the most popular one everyone else was talking about<br />
and using (links). We&#8217;d also assume i&#8217;d be probably one that had been used for a while<br />
(Age).</p>
<p>(2005) On January 18th, Google created the &quot;no follow&quot; tag and began tracing links<br />
that shouldn&#8217;t count as a &quot;popularity&quot; vote. They shouldn&#8217;t give value to your rankings<br />
and standings in the engines.</p>
<p>In December of 2005 the entire game changed with the &quot;Big Daddy&quot; update. Many<br />
of those changes are still in effect today.</p>
<p>Now, a link is not just a link&#8230; (Well, except maybe on Yahoo&#8230;) But MSN &amp; Google<br />
have decided to include the idea of &quot;trust&quot;.</p>
<p>Trusted links are those that come from OLDER more credible sites. Sites that are<br />
linked to other major outlets like Associated Press, Reuters &amp; CNN and similar.<br />
The NUMBER of links alone is truly just an imaginative number that means nothing.<br />
3 Links from CNN, BBC &amp; other press could easily out rank a site with 3,000 links<br />
from unknown sites.</p>
<p><strong>(2005-2007) Birth of Web 2.0 &amp; Social Media In Search</strong></p>
<p>Sites like digg.com and social bookmarking as well as social networking like ryze,<br />
linkedin, facebook and literally thousands of other ones popped up as well. They&#8217;re<br />
now starting to shift the results on Google results like a tsunami under the ocean<br />
simply thru popularity.</p>
<p><strong>What Matters Today? Modern Information Retrieval Via Google.</strong></p>
<p>Things have changed ALOT since 2006. Some major things have been implemented<br />
that are evolving to this moment.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m starting a website called GoogleMythKiller.com (feel free to signup but it&#8217;s not<br />
even close to ready yet&#8230;)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to dispell things like.. .</p>
<p><strong>Can A New Website Rank In Google? </strong></p>
<p>YES! It can, want to know how? Sign up.. I&#8217;ll show you how with Few links and no<br />
promotion, you could show up as a major player.</p>
<p><strong>Does Pagerank Matter?</strong></p>
<p>No, and I&#8217;ll tell you why it shouldn&#8217;t be a part of your planning.</p>
<p><strong>Can you get banned for duplicate content? </strong></p>
<p>Nope. Will duplicate content rank, yup! I&#8217;ll explain more about that too.</p>
<p><strong>Lastly, another big one. Can you get links too quickly? Yes!</strong></p>
<p>There are some types of links where you can get over 100,000 overnight (yes, that&#8217;s a real<br />
number) and Google will value every one of them. And there are other scenarios, where<br />
you can get 50 in one day and get bumped out of the index&#8230; Scared yet? If you don&#8217;t know<br />
what i&#8217;m talking about, you owe it to yourself to find out more.</p>
<p><strong>This Week&#8217;s take away&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Google isn&#8217;t built by web marketers, it&#8217;s built by Engineers. Engineers think logically and<br />
very scientifically.  Look at your website navigation.</p>
<p>Navigation should be very simple and look much like a science lab textbook or university<br />
website..</p>
<p>Home page (Menu)<br />
- News<br />
- Press<br />
- Updates etc.</p>
<p>- Health<br />
- Heart<br />
- Lungs<br />
- Breathing<br />
- Resperatory</p>
<p>See how every topic is nested inside another topic? Consider your blog categories on this<br />
same level. Do you keep on topic &amp; Use lots of related words within each category?</p>
<p>When sites like this get spidered they gain instant crediblity &amp; trust within google. It&#8217;s just one<br />
part of over <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/03/business/yourmoney/03google.html?pagewanted=4">200 signals google</a> uses to control the results showing up when you search.</p>
<p>I will begin from credible sources to cite MOST of those 200 signals and the guestimate<br />
on weighting based on 13 years observing the SEO Industry.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Daniel J Deyette</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://Competitiondemolition.com/understanding-google-seo-myths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

